http://frederatorblogs.disqus.com/enWed, 11 Feb 2009 00:14:24 -0000http://frederatorblogs.com/channel_frederator/2008/10/21/sleeping-beauty-and-eyvind-earle/#comment-6169893<p>The Xerox process meant that the animators' drawings could be copied straight onto cells instead of being traced by hand which took much more time.</p>AshWed, 11 Feb 2009 00:14:24 -0000http://frederatorblogs.com/channel_frederator/2008/10/21/sleeping-beauty-and-eyvind-earle/#comment-3205681<p>I wondered the same thing, and looked into it. I think they were referring to the inking process, and not painting, as it was reported. After this film, Disney released "101 Dalmations". This film used a Xerox process for getting the drawings onto the cels (thus the much looser line quality). </p>Floyd BishopTue, 21 Oct 2008 14:11:55 -0000http://frederatorblogs.com/channel_frederator/2008/10/21/sleeping-beauty-and-eyvind-earle/#comment-3203659<p>This may be a stupid question, but how were the cells painted after this? I thought digital wouldn't be around till decades later.</p>BenTue, 21 Oct 2008 12:17:13 -0000