-
Website
http://frederatorblogs.com -
Original page
http://frederatorblogs.com/channel_frederator/2008/09/01/character-design/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
JeauxJanovsky
34 comments · 1 points
-
Fred Seibert
141 comments · 2 points
-
Coonfoot
66 comments · 1 points
-
DarkCosmoMX
14 comments · 1 points
-
Niko Anesti
60 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Frederator Studios Blogs | The Fairly Odd-Blog | Some “Anti-Poof” Character Color
22 hours ago · 1 comment
-
Frederator Studios Blogs | Stephen M. Levinson's Blog | Gnomon Finished!
1 day ago · 2 comments
-
Frederator Studios Blogs | Fanboy and Chum Chum | “Pretty Fly for a White Guy”
1 day ago · 1 comment
-
Frederator Studios Blogs | Adventure Time with Finn and Jake | “An Ogre Named Donny” Storyboard
6 days ago · 7 comments
-
Frederator Studios Blogs | The Fairly Odd-Blog | POOF & FOOP
4 days ago · 2 comments
-
Frederator Studios Blogs | The Fairly Odd-Blog | Some “Anti-Poof” Character Color
1) I think it's a great way to come up with sluggish, uninteresting designs.
2) It gives young people a whole new set of words to throw around instead of getting down with the business of actually doing something useful.
Don't get me wrong - I think the academic examination of character design is possibly an interesting pursuit, but I doubt there are many designers of classic characters (which were never designed really - they evolved) who thought much about it at the time.
Mostly they could just draw really, really well and knew when it felt right.
I think the articles help give people a broader base of things to keep in mind when designing a character.
Agreed entirely - but I still think the artists response to the brief was instinctive and not technical.
I am suggesting that artists (particularly young, impressionable artists) who pay close attention to this run the risk of creating exactly the kind of characters they are trying to avoid.